Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!


Advanced Packaging : 3d Silicon And Glass Interposers
Reort On 3D Silicon and Glass Interposers

Why and how 2.5D integration will impact more than 15% of the IC substrate business by 2017

2.5D AND 3D INTEGRATION IS SET TO BE A LONG-LASTING TREND IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY
After meeting with swift commercial success on a few initial applications, including MEMS, sensors and power amplifiers, 3D integration has been on everyonea�?s mind for the past five years. However, once the initial euphoria faded, and despite technical developments which assured most observers that mass adoption of 3D was not out of reach, some unanticipated technical and supply chain hurdles were revealed that were higher than anticipated. It was then that 2.5D integration by means of 3D glass or silicon interposers was revealed by experts as a necessary stepping-stone to full 3D integration. Our first report on 3D interposers and 2.5D integration was in 2010; at that time, we listed the various applications of this technology trend and its drivers, and we showed that glass and silicon interposers were expected to become high-volume necessities, rather than just high-performance solutions for a few niche applications. http://www.ronpcb.com

Wafer foundries appear to be the most able entities to offer manufacturing solutions on the open market, both technically and in terms of capex investment capabilities. But their ambition extends far beyond the manufacturing of wafers Rigid flex, and into assembly and test services as well.

Concurrently, some of the major IDMs are preparing to exploit their wide capabilities and to enter the open foundry and assembly services side for 2.5D and 3D integration based on such new type of IC package substrate technologies.

IS COST REALLY AN ISSUE IN THE LONG TERM?
Significant investments began in 2012, with more than $150M capex expected and driven by both wafer foundries (TSMC, Global Foundries) and OSATs (Amkor, ASE). No one, especially in Taiwan, wants to be left behind in this high-growth story, as it clearly appears to be a central piece of the increasing middle-end business and infrastructure, halfway between the front-end silicon foundries and the back-end assembly & test facilities.

The question now is: a�can anyone build a profitable business case to support the growth of 2.5D/3D interposersa�? In other words, how long will it take for investing companies to be paid back, while offering affordable prices to their customers? Yole expects the expansion model of this new technology trend to follow a traditional path: first, high-value modules are expected to use the technology to offer unprecedented high performance Rigid flex PCB, followed by higher volume applications.

The nice thing about 2.5D interposers is that they do not only allow for unprecedented performance: they can do so for a much lower cost than any competing technology. Through a few cost cases in this report, we demonstrate that cost can be a strong adoption driver too. No, silicon and glass interposers are not a�additional dead pieces of hardware in the packagea� -- on the contrary, they are among the top five key elements of the semiconductor roadmap for the decade 2010-2020.

KEY FEATURES OF THE REPORT
Detailed view, by product and device type, of the key applications driving the commercialization of 2.5D interposer substrates
Detailed 2011 a� 2017 market forecast in both unit and wafer shipments, including a revenues analysis of Middle-end to Back-end assembly & test-related activities
Overview of the positioning of different key players, and an understanding of supply chain challenges happening between the different business models in place
Technology trends & roadmaps, including the topic of glass interposers and the possible move to large PANEL area processing, leveraging LCD or PCB infrastructures
Detailed cost structure of several different 2.5D interposer packages: system-level evaluation of several different case scenarios, analyzing the expected cost decrease trend over five years
Analysis of the required investment in terms of capex between 2011 - 2017

Our Blogs : http://www.ronpcb.com
Related Links